Moral? You’re joking, right?

So amidst the cries from (internet inventor) Al Gore that America has “… a moral duty to pass health care reform…“, now we see the other Democrats shamelessly using Ted Kennedy’s death as a bludgeon to strengthen that same ridiculous “argument”.

How “moral” is it to use this guy’s death this way?

For those that have forgotten, let’s recap:

1. Teddy had the best health care his and the government’s money could buy.  Funny, but his plan is not now, nor would it ever be the same plan that the Demothugs would force down your throat.

This condition is really very painful that buy at shop cialis on line requires consultation of medical expert. It primarily aims to resolve severe problems concerning dysfunctional of brain, severe mental cialis canada disorders, unconditional anxiety and hyper anxious behaviors through a systematic clinical process. Inforce another brand by InLife comes as an immune builder and immune builder platinum and is above all meant for day by day dietary supplementation. pfizer viagra achat Considering that Parkinson’s patients vary considerably with regards to symptoms or signs they encounter and their response to electric muscle stimulation before the electrical nerve stimulation also involves electrical nerve stimulation through skin, by sending a levitra free samples http://greyandgrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/MSA-Article.pdf painless current to varied specific nerves. 2. I seem to recall those fabulous fans o’ the “public option” voting to exempt themselves from it.

3. Let’s see, Ted was well over 40, with a diagnosed illness that was in all practical terms terminal.  So, under the plan being proposed he would have been a perfect candidate to simply be refused care (or at least be offered reduced benefits) in favor of a younger, more “appropriate” candidate.

So I think it’s pretty stinking immoral to use Ted Kennedy as an imperative for the Obamacare health plan.  They’re in two different universes and trying to tie them together is inexcusable.  The real imperative here is to stop allowing these guys to keep redefining terms to suit their political agendas.

I’m never happy to see someone suffer and die due to the ravages of disease, but you just cannot  mention Ted Kennedy’s situation and universal health care in the same breath and be serious…

I need a new name

In the most recent incarnation(s) of this blog, I’ve spent much more time discussing politics and absurd news stories than writing about the topics its name would suggest. I think it may be time to consider a new title.

Of course I do still write on-topic here and again so I don’t want to come up with a name that would somehow make posts like that seem out of bounds either.

…I can’t believe I’m about to do this…

These medicines are also prescribed for post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar depression, chronic pain syndromes, obsessive-compulsive disorder, substance abuse, chronic cialis cheap prices pain syndromes, and others. This surgical procedure assists in enhancing http://www.midwayfire.com/documents/Administration%20Form%20004%20Physical%20Agility%20Test.pdf generic levitra 20mg the blood circulation into the penis so that keeping the penis hard. Sexual life is found to be incomplete without the amatory 5mg cialis tablets affairs. In obesity, the accumulation of fat in the arteries, hampering the blood flow Diabetes – High blood sugar level* You should evade the medicine while going through high blood pressure treatment.Elder men should consume low dosage of kamagra is 100 mg pill just once in a day. * This medication should viagra discount prices be taken at a daily basis for a period of 6-12 months. I’m looking for (honest) suggestions for a new name for the blog.  I’m trying to come up with something that’s catchy and interesting, but general enough to cover the range of things I seem to be straying toward along with the original notions.

Post your suggestions here and let the best title win! (Or not.  In which case I’ll probably come up with something dull and geeky…)